![]() ![]() Is the below FFmpeg announcement applicable to Handbrake? I don't quite understand the FFmpeg/LibAV situation'. Hopefully it will eventually become on-par with FDK. Please also be aware that if you are distributing any previous 0.10.x you must cease doing so now due to licensing issues.Īccording to Handbrake see HandBrake - AAC Encode Change the quality of the LibAV AAC encoder is lacking in comparison to FDK but is passable for most."We are looking into upgrading LibAV to get further improvements in their AAC encoder. Unfortunately due to circumstances beyond our control we can no longer include binary distributions of HandBrake which include the FDK-AAC encoder. I don't see that they changed the x264 encoder. I don't know which/how GPU would work on a mac however, all my experience is with a PC.Is the FFmpeg AAC encoder a viable alternative to Fraunhofer's FDK-AAC encoder which is no longer included with Handbrake? The main benefit of installing the new Handbrake release is in updated x265 encoder (1.9). If I'm compressing something lower quality than 1920x1080, I use GPU cuz the source is already lower than I care about and I can't tell the difference between them at those resolutions. If producing pretty damn good but not the best compressed video fast and can ignore the video snobs saying "GPU is shit", GPU is the answer. If producing the best possible compressed video is your goal, use (slow) CPU. CPU can utilize all the options in libx264/5 but CPU encoding is not as efficient or fast as GPU encoding, but you can tweak many more options to produce a superior video.Its also "good enough" without the full codec support and gets better every hardware rev. GPU encoding can compress video very fast, but doesn't support all the options of cpu/libx264/5 so is technically inferior from an option standpoint, but far superior in a speed standpoint.Blow that up to 1280x720 or god forbid 1920x1080 and it will look like complete ass. You could downscale your 10gb video to 320x180 with 500kbp/s to quickly compress it to 500mb and it would probably look great, at 320x180. Zoom sacrifices bitrate and resolution for a fast clear live picture with h264. You can wrap it with Handbrake, StaxRip, whatever open source software and it boils down to x26. There is a reason, its the best non-license, non-hardware dependent option available and it gets great results. Professional ones too (Topaz does, its ffmpeg on the backside using libx264/5, so is handbrake). Just make sure to tag the post with the flair and give a little background info/context.Īll opensource software uses the exact same libraries for compression, libx264 and libx265. On Fridays we'll allow posts that don't normally fit in the usual data-hoarding theme, including posts that would usually be removed by rule 4: “No memes or 'look at this '” ![]() We are not your personal archival army.No unapproved sale threads, advertisement posts, or giveaways.No memes or 'look at this old storage medium/ connection speed/purchase' (except on Free Post Fridays). ![]() Search the Internet, this subreddit and our wiki before posting. ![]() R/DataHorader 2013-2023 Searchable Archives Historic Reddit Archives & Download Tools, Etc.ģ.3v Pin Reset Directions :D / Alt Imgur link And we're trying really hard not to forget. Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Timetm). government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data - legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |